Posted on August 6, 2009 by bfhu
<img src=”http://i76.photobucket.com/albums/j25/eyepaintmyworld/breadfromheaven-JPEG-1.jpg” alt=”” />
Q. I understand why you would think Mary was saved prior to her birth, but it simply doesn’t line up with what Jesus said. He died once for all of us. The perfect sacrifice without spot nor blemish. It had to be a blood sacrifice! He didn’t die once for Mary and [...]
Filed under: immaculate conception | 1 Comment »
Posted on December 18, 2008 by bfhu
Mariano: My question as to how you know that doctrines that are particular to Roman Catholicism predated the canonized New Testament. Let us consider the “Sinlessness of Mary/Immaculate Conception of Mary.”
The following is a partial list of those who considered Jesus alone to be sinless, and or considered Mary to have sinned, and or [...]
Filed under: immaculate conception | 8 Comments »
Posted on February 8, 2008 by bfhu
Q. Since Mary had other children, the brothers of Jesus, would they not be sinless also?
A. The brothers and sisters of Jesus are kinsmen of Jesus or else Joseph’s children by previous marriage. They are not full siblings of Jesus. They are either cousins or step-siblings. Mary gave birth to only one child and remained [...]
Filed under: immaculate conception | Leave a Comment »
Posted on February 2, 2008 by bfhu
J: First of all my friend, I am not anti_Catholic. The word is a bit harsh as it forments hatred, but let me assure you that i am not an anti-Catholic. My wife in fact is a Catholic.
BFHU: I apologize, I did not in any way mean to imply that you were anti-Catholic. And [...]
Filed under: Mary, immaculate conception | Leave a Comment »
Posted on February 1, 2008 by bfhu
Jeronie: I appreciate your response. However, I have some comments as well.
First, the Bible prophesied that the Messiah shall come from the line of David,
which means Mary could have been a distant relative of David. Now take note that
David has once been an adulterer and murderer, in short he has sinned.
Therefore, if Mary came from [...]
Filed under: Mary, immaculate conception | 4 Comments »
Posted on January 30, 2008 by bfhu
Jeronie Frias: “Jesus and Mary were sinless…” whose teaching is this that Mary is sinless?
BFHU: This is taught by the Catholic Church, the Church that Jesus Christ founded.
JF:There’s no verse anywhere else in the Scriptures that says Mary is sinless.
Are you aware that you are clinging to a Protestant tradition? There is [...]
Filed under: Mary, immaculate conception | 6 Comments »
Posted on January 28, 2008 by bfhu
Q. Mary, like every other Jew of her time, was born under law. In other words, under the old covenant, she had to obey the 10 Commandments and all the ceremonial laws given by God through Moses. For example, we see her observing the pregnancy and childbirth laws here:
(Luke 2:22-24) When the time of their [...]
Filed under: Mary, immaculate conception | 4 Comments »
Posted on January 26, 2008 by bfhu
Below is a discussion based on a comment to Martin Luther & the Immaculate Conception
Comment: All honor and praise belong to Jesus and Jesus only.
Response: If you mean WORHIP, I agree we are to worship Jesus and not worship Mary. That would be idolotry and is condemned by the Catholic Church. Also, surely you [...]
Filed under: Mary, immaculate conception | 2 Comments »
Posted on December 8, 2007 by bfhu
Q. Does the Doctrine of the Immaculate Conception refer to Jesus or Mary?
A. This doctrine refers to Mary. She was concieved in the normal way by her parents. It was immaculate because Mary was conceived without the stain of original sin passed on to the human race from Adam and Eve. Just as God created [...]
Filed under: Mary, immaculate conception | 2 Comments »
Posted on November 8, 2007 by bfhu
Bread From Heaven: Protestants forget that both Adam and Eve were created without sin. Most of the Angels did not sin and people in Heaven do not sin and that does not make any of them God. So sinlessness is a human trait that God originally bestowed upon human beings. It was also His desire [...]
Filed under: Mary, immaculate conception | 2 Comments »