Posted on February 28, 2009 by bfhu
The scenario: You participate in an employee Bible study every day on your lunch hour. This particular Monday, Fred, a new employee, is introduced to the group. He announces he’s a former Catholic and is also a part-time minister at a nondenominational “Bible church” in a nearby town. As you begin, Fred opens [...]
Filed under: Petros, Pope | Leave a Comment »
Posted on January 30, 2009 by bfhu
Q. If Jesus was making Peter His Prime Minister in the Church then why did He call Peter Satan a few verses later?
A. Peter was still very human, subject to sin, and the influence of Our Enemy. Because, Peter, in trying to dissuade Jesus from the cross, came under the influence of Satan [...]
Filed under: Petros, Pope, infallibility | Leave a Comment »
Posted on March 16, 2008 by bfhu
Q. So what is the support for the contention that the Catholic Church is the prescribed “organization of believers” despite their unchristian behavior over many centuries.
A. Well, we have 1500 more years of history as an organization than the Lutherans and Presbyterians. And there are more Catholics worldwide than all of the Protestant denominations [...]
Filed under: Petros, Pope | Leave a Comment »
Posted on March 14, 2008 by bfhu
Q. It would seem that of first importance in this discussion is the proof of the primacy that the Catholic Church claims. Was Peter really made the rock on which the church would stand and did this establish an Apostolic legacy that the Catholic Church claims as its authoritative support. What about Peter [...]
Filed under: Petros, Pope | Leave a Comment »
Posted on April 2, 2007 by bfhu
Q. Isn’t the problem, with the Catholic argument that Peter is the Rock of Matthew 16, that the Greek word used by Jesus for the Rock foundation of His Church is petra but the name He uses for Peter is Petros? Doesn’t Petra, meaning a BIG rock refer to Peter’s confession whereas, petros, [...]
Filed under: Petros, Pope, The Church | 6 Comments »